Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Angela Bate
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In healthcare, resources are often insufficient to meet all claims on them. In this respect, resources are considered scarce and have to be managed by prioritizing between competing claims. Economics as a discipline explicitly addresses this reality by acknowledging resource scarcity. However, the extent to which economics actually influences such prioritizing decisions in healthcare is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to review the use of economics in priority setting decision making. We outline the key principles of economics as they apply to priority setting and review the methods reported in the literature with respect to these. We find that these methods, even economic methods (e.g., those typically used in conducting economic evaluations such as cost-effectiveness analyses) do not tend to explicitly incorporate economic principles. We argue therefore that these methods, when applied to the context of priority setting, are not sufficient and that what is required is a broader framework that can incorporate the output from economic methods yet also be pragmatically applicable. We then go on to present an alternative approach - namely program budgeting and marginal analysis. Finally, we put forward our case for using program budgeting and marginal analysis in priority setting practice and set out some future research challenges. © 2006 Future Drugs Ltd.
Author(s): Bate A, Mitton C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
Year: 2006
Volume: 6
Issue: 3
Pages: 275-284
ISSN (print): 1473-7167
ISSN (electronic): 1744-8379
Publisher: Expert Reviews Ltd.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737167.6.3.275
DOI: 10.1586/14737167.6.3.275
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
