Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Scientific life should be measured in seven year units

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Bruce Charlton

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Traditional wisdom and empirical observation unite in recommending a 7 year unit for measuring human life - including individual and institutional science. But, because of astronomy and the decimal system, things tend to be measured either in years, five years or in decades. A year is too short while a decade is too long to measure the trends and transitions of individual or institutional life. And the half decade, such as the 'five year plan' beloved by politicians and bureaucrats seems too short. Therefore, seven years should become the standard unit for tracking trends and measuring attainment. Precedents for using a seven year unit include the notorious Jesuit saying: 'Give me the child until he is seven, and I will show you the man'; and the 'ninth commandment' of Leo Szilard: 'Do your work for six years; but in the seventh, go into solitude or among strangers, so that the memory of your friends does not prevent you from being what you have become'. In a scientific career, seven years is approximately the time spent at high school, the time taken for a traditional basic scientific training of first degree and doctorate, and the period after the doctorate building the knowledge to become an expert specialist. There seems to be enough anecdotal evidence to support the idea that we should reconsider the universal but un-reflective use of decimal units in planning and evaluation. For instance, seven year fellowships and program grants might replace the current five year versions. A new - and previously unconsidered - field of research beckons. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Charlton BG

Publication type: Editorial

Publication status: Published

Journal: Medical Hypotheses

Year: 2006

Volume: 66

Issue: 6

Pages: 1051-1052

ISSN (print): 0306-9877

ISSN (electronic): 1532-2777

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2006.02.017

DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.02.017

PubMed id: 16524670


Share