Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Sam Turner,
Dr Robert Young
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The "concealed communities" of our title are the people archaeologists have often labeled as "marginal." Archaeologists writing about both prehistoric and historic periods have commonly made a range of assumptions about margins and marginality, and their discussions have often categorized marginality as ecological, economic, or socio-political. Whilst it has been common to privilege one or other of these categories in order to explain how societies worked, they are rarely mutually exclusive. In addition, since marginality is relative, virtually any group might be made marginal depending on people's perspectives in the past or present. Sometimes marginality can be imposed (economically or politically), and sometimes even actively chosen. Defining the "margin" is a complex business, and the term needs sensitive, context-orientated use to make it useful for archaeologists. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007.
Author(s): Turner S, Young R
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: International Journal of Historical Archaeology
Print publication date: 01/12/2007
ISSN (print): 1092-7697
ISSN (electronic): 1573-7748
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric