Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Daniel Nettle
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Empathizing and systemizing have recently been put forward as two important individual-difference dimensions, whose different mean levels in men and women are argued to account for many psychological sex differences. This paper presents a series of studies designed to investigate the reliability and validity of the empathizing and systemizing quotients (EQ & SQ), to relate them to existing personality constructs, and to replicate reported sex and sexual orientation-related differences. Correlations with interests and social behaviour suggest the two measures are valid. However, empathizing appears essentially equivalent to agreeableness in the five-factor model of personality. Systemizing cannot be reduced to established personality dimensions, though it is moderately correlated with conscientiousness and openness. Men have higher levels of systemizing than women, and non-heterosexual women higher than heterosexuals. However, no differences were found between heterosexual and non-heterosexual men. Although systemizing and empathizing account for a number of observed sex differences, there are others they do not explain. © 2007 The British Psychological Society.
Author(s): Nettle D
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: British Journal of Psychology
ISSN (print): 0007-1269
Publisher: The British Psychological Society
PubMed id: 17456271
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric