Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Determining what is important in a good formulation

Lookup NU author(s): Alyson Flitcroft, Professor Mark FreestonORCiD, Amy Wood-Mitchell

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.

Abstract

Research suggests that there is low inter-rater reliability between therapists when asked to formulate the same case and that there may be discrepancies in what is considered an essential part of a formulation. The present study aimed to explore the diversity of therapists' viewpoints regarding the purpose and essential features of a cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) case formulation of depression. A Q-sort methodology was used in order to render these beliefs operational. Seven experienced CBT therapists participated in the construction of 86 statements, capturing concepts considered relevant to a CBT formulation of depression. This Q-sort was then administered to 23 therapists, who rated these statements in terms of their importance using a Q-sort procedure. Three factors emerged, suggesting three dominant opinions as to the importance of features of a formulation. A "state" CBT factor, focusing on the "here and now", accounted for most variance; followed by a second factor emphasizing "function and process" and a third factor emphasizing "trait" components. Whilst there was some agreement between what was considered to be least important in a formulation, the emergence of three distinct viewpoints suggests a lack of complete consensus amongst the therapists. © 2007 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Flitcroft A, James IA, Freeston M, Wood-Mitchell A

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Year: 2007

Volume: 35

Issue: 3

Pages: 325-333

ISSN (print): 13524658

ISSN (electronic): 1469-1833

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S135246580600350X

DOI: 10.1017/S135246580600350X

Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric

Share