Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Penelope Hawken,
Dr Andrew Beard
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Application of the ram effect during the breeding season has been previously disregarded because the ewe reproductive axis is powerfully inhibited by luteal phase progesterone concentrations. However, anovulatory ewes treated with exogenous progestagens respond to ram introduction with an increase in LH concentrations. We therefore tested whether cyclic ewes would respond to ram introduction with an increase in pulsatile LH secretion at all stages of the estrous cycle. We did two experiments using genotypes native to temperate or Mediterranean regions. In Experiment 1 (UK), 12 randomly cycling, North of England Mule ewes were introduced to rams midway through a frequent blood-sampling regime. Ewes in the early (EL; n = 6) and late luteal (LL; n = 6) phase responded to ram introduction with an increase in LH pulse frequency and mean and basal concentrations of LH (at least P < 0.05). In Experiment 2 (Australia), the cycles of 32 Merino ewes were synchronised using intravaginal progestagen pessaries. Pessary insertion was staggered to produce eight ewes at each stage of the estrous cycle: follicular (F), early luteal (EL), mid-luteal (ML) and late luteal (LL). In all stages of the cycle, ewes responded to ram introduction with an increase in LH pulse frequency (P < 0.01); EL, ML and LL ewes also had an increase in mean LH concentration (P < 0.05). In conclusion, ram introduction to cyclic ewes stimulated an increase in pulsatile LH secretion, independent of ewe genotype or stage of the estrous cycle. Crown Copyright © 2007.
Author(s): Hawken PAR, Beard AP, Esmaili T, Kadokawa H, Evans ACO, Blache D, Martin GB
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
ISSN (print): 0093-691X
ISSN (electronic): 1879-3231
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
PubMed id: 17477966
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric