Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Bruce Charlton, Dr Peter Andras
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
We argue that the most ambitious science is intrinsically riskier science, more likely to fail. It is almost always a safer career strategy for the best scientists to seek to extend knowledge more modestly and to build incrementally on existing ideas and methods. Therefore, higher rewards for success are a necessary incentive to encourage top scientists to work on the most important scientific problems, ones where the solution has potentially revolutionary implications. We suggest that mega-cash prizes (measured in tens of millions of dollars) are a suitable reward for those individuals (or institutions) whose work has triggered radically new directions in science. © 2008.
Author(s): Charlton BG, Andras P
Publication type: Editorial
Publication status: Published
Journal: Medical Hypotheses
Year: 2008
Volume: 70
Issue: 4
Pages: 709-713
ISSN (print): 0306-9877
ISSN (electronic): 1532-2777
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2008.01.001
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.01.001
PubMed id: 18289798