Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Ruth Graham,
Professor Steve Robson,
Professor Judith Rankin
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The medical procedure of 'feticide' has been used in clinical practice since the early 1990s in the UK. The procedure constitutes a sensitive aspect of late termination of pregnancy (TOP), an issue that is in itself contentious. The procedure has attracted attention from academic and policy commentators, but recently the medical profession has expressed some uncertainty with respect to the legal position of live birth following TOP, and professional discretion in providing feticide. To understand the meaning of these comments better, we argue that it is helpful to acknowledge the rhetoric that shapes the academic discourse on feticide. In this paper, we review how feticide has been conceptualised within academic discourse, demonstrating that the concept has multiple meanings, some of which could be considered politically charged. We then consider some examples of the comments made about the legal uncertainties of feticide, highlighting assumptions made about the problematic nature of professional discretion. Ultimately, we suggest that a better understanding of the context of feticide is needed to ensure that future research in this area of health care engages adequately with issues of professional discretion. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Graham RH, Robson SC, Rankin JM
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Social Science and Medicine
ISSN (print): 0277-9536
ISSN (electronic): 1873-5347
PubMed id: 17920742
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric