Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Aonghais Cook, Professor Stephen Rushton
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Birds feeding on landfill sites cause problems in terms of nuisance to neighbors, flight safety, a threat to public health, and affecting the day to day site operation. A number of control measures exist to deter problem species; however, research into their effectiveness across sites and for multiple species has been limited. We use a modeling approach in order to assess the effectiveness of nine techniques - pyrotechnics, hand-held distress calls, static distress calls, blank ammunition, a combination of blank and lethal use of ammunition, the use of falcons, the use of hawks, wailers and helium-filled bird-scaring kites - at deterring three commonly recorded species - the Black-headed Gull (Larus ridibundus), the Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) and the Lesser Black-backed Gull (Larus fuscus) - from six landfill sites across the United Kingdom. The use of distress calls, falconry, and combinations of lethal and nonlethal use of ammunition were the most effective techniques for initially deterring birds from these sites. However, when habituation is considered, there is a clear difference between techniques such as falconry, which have a lethal aspect and may act to reinforce the deterrence, and the use of techniques such as distress calls, which do not. However there are problems related to legislation and public perception when lethal techniques are used. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Author(s): Cook A, Rushton S, Allan J, Baxter A
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Environmental Management
Year: 2008
Volume: 41
Issue: 6
Pages: 834-843
ISSN (print): 0364-152X
ISSN (electronic): 1432-1009
Publisher: Springer New York LLC
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9077-7
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9077-7
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
