Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor John Pendlebury
The majority of studies of British post-war reconstruction planning have focused on the better-known plans for larger towns and cities, yet many much smaller places were also represented in the tremendous outpouring of plans in the period c. 1951-2. This paper discusses the context of the smaller town replanning, using four very different unbombed towns and plans as exemplars (Bewdley, Durham, Todmorden and Warwick). Uninformative and incomplete records still preclude explicit discussion of why consultants were chosen in each of these cases and, indeed, small towns seem unusually prone to engage expensive consultants. Key common themes in the plans included road provision and housing conditions; indeed, the concerns of these small-town plans are little different from those of larger, and badly-bombed, places - perhaps because consultants were used. However, the removal of planning powers from all of these authorities under the 1947 Act meant that implementation of expensive plans was delayed and substantially amended: perhaps the bandwagon of replanning was not worth the expense?
Author(s): Larkham PJ, Pendlebury J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Planning Perspectives
Year: 2008
Volume: 23
Issue: 3
Pages: 291-321
ISSN (print): 0266-5433
ISSN (electronic): 1466-4518
Publisher: Routledge
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02665430802102807
DOI: 10.1080/02665430802102807
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
