Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Steve Parry,
Dr Janine Gray,
Professor Julia Newton,
Professor Rose Anne Kenny
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Head-up tilt testing is the investigation of choice in the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. The test is time consuming and labour intensive, with conventional tilt testing taking up to 45 min. We compared a shortened 'front-loaded' 20-min glyceryl trinitrate-provoked head-up tilt (FLGTN-HUT) with the standard 40-min passive tilt (HUT) as first line investigations in patients with unexplained syncope and asymptomatic controls. In the study, 149 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope and 83 asymptomatic controls were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to FLGTN-HUT (800 mcg, metred spray) or HUT, then the opposite tilt-test 1 week later. Seventeen (11.4%) patients had diagnostic haemodynamic changes and symptom reproduction during HUT and 54 (36.2%) during FLGTN-HUT. A total of 24.8% more patients had a positive test with FLGTN-HUT than with passive HUT (95% CI: 16.3%, 33.4%). Nine (10.8%) controls had significant haemodynamic changes during HUT and 23 (27.7%) during GTN provocation. Seven controls had haemodynamic changes on both HUT and FLGTN-HUT testing. The controls group had 16.8% more significant haemodynamic changes with FLGTN-HUT than with HUT (95% CI: 0.06, 27.4). The front-loaded GTN protocol provided a higher diagnostic rate than passive tilt testing, and provides a rapid alternative to conventional methods, though false positivity rates are higher. Copyright © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.
Author(s): Parry SW, Gray JC, Newton JL, Reeve P, O'Shea D, Kenny RA
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Age and Ageing
ISSN (print): 0002-0729
ISSN (electronic): 1468-2834
Publisher: Oxford University Press
PubMed id: 18586835
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric