Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Alistair Elfick, Ian Pinder
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
A theoretical relationship was recently proposed relating the wear behavior of polymetric bearing materials articulating against hard counterfaces.(1) This model attempts to predict the influence of surface roughness on wear. Laboratory-based studies have been used to establish the validity of these relationships, but their application to the clinical situation has not been investigated fully, Forty-two retrieved PCA hip joints have been assessed. The total wear volume was calculated from the penetration measured using the shadowgraph method, and roughness of the articulating surfaces was recorded using noncontacting profilometry. The roughness of the explanted femoral heads was observed to increase (median S-a - 10.35 nm worn region, 3.05 nm peripheral region), while that of the acetabular liner fell dramatically (median S-a - 41 nn worn region, 212 nm unworn region). No evidence of a relationship between the topography of the worn regions of the femoral head and that of the acetabular liner could be found. Similarly, the strength of the association between the surface roughness and the clinical wear factor was considerably poorer than that achieved in laboratory experiments. A number of reasons for this observation are proposed, Most deleterious was considered to be the inability of the roughness parameters to describe the damaging features of the surface adequately. Uncertainty as to when the surface of the component degrades during its life serves to introduce further doubt as to the application of the wear models in the clinical environment. In conclusion, this study fails to provide clinical evidence to substantiate the relationship between surface finish and wear rate, The adoption of standardized measurement parameters and techniques would facilitate the direct comparison of joint types and the selection of the most advantageous materials. (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Author(s): Elfick APD, Hall RM, Pinder IM, Unsworth A
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Year: 1999
Volume: 48
Issue: 5
Pages: 712-718
Print publication date: 20/09/1999
ISSN (print): 1549-3296
ISSN (electronic): 1552-4965
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:5<712::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-R
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:5<712::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-R
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
