Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Philip Shackley, Professor Cam Donaldson
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
We describe a willingness to pay (WTP) survey in which values were elicited from the public for three disparate health care programmes. Previous applications of WTP in this context have revealed a high proportion of preference reversals between WTP values and ordinal ranking of the programmes. In view of the doubts these findings raise over the use of WTP in this context, our aim was to develop a method of eliciting WTP values which we considered would improve consistency between respondents' explicit ranking of the programmes and their WTP values. Compared to the standard approach, the structure of the new design (the marginal approach) reduced the number of possible preference reversals, thus encouraging a degree of consistency among respondents. Despite this, the marginal approach did not result in fewer preference reversal being observed in actuality, thus casting doubt on the application of WTP in this context. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Shackley P; Donaldson C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Health Economics
Year: 2002
Volume: 21
Issue: 6
Pages: 971-991
ISSN (print): 0167-6296
ISSN (electronic): 1879-1646
Publisher: Elsevier BV
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00052-8
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00052-8
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric