Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

The deconstruction of safety arguments through adversarial counter-argument

Lookup NU author(s): Dr James Armstrong, Dr Stephen Paynter

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.

Abstract

The project Deconstructive Evaluation of Risk In Dependability Arguments and Safety Cases (DERIDASC) has recently experimented with techniques borrowed from literary theory as safety case analysis techniques. This paper introduces our high-level method for "deconstructing" safety arguments. Our approach is quite general and should be applicable to different types of safety argumentation framework. As one example, we outline how the approach would work in the context of the Goal Structure Notation (GSN).

Publication metadata

Author(s): Armstrong JM, Paynter SE

Editor(s): Heisel, M., Liggesmeyer, P., Wittmann, S.

Publication type: Conference Proceedings (inc. Abstract)

Publication status: Published

Conference Name: Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security: 23rd International Conference (SAFECOMP)

Year of Conference: 2004

Pages: 3-16

ISSN: 0302-9743

Publisher: Springer

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30138-7_2

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30138-7_2

Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item

Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science

ISBN: 9783540231769

Share