Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Frequency of Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error checks

Lookup NU author(s): Michael Birch, Neeta Ray-Chaudhuri

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Purpose: To investigate how quickly Goldmann applanation tonometers used in clinical practice develop calibration errors, and to determine the frequency of checks required to detect these errors. Materials and Methods: Prospective check of the calibration error of all Haag-Streit Goldmann applanation tonometers in the department at month zero, month one, and month four. The tonometers were checked according to the Haag-Streit method using a standard calibration check weight bar by two independent observers. Calibration errors were classed as ± 0.5 to 2.5 mm Hg, ± 3 to 4 mm Hg, or >± 4 min Hg. Torrometers with a calibration error greater than ± 2.5 mm Hg were returned to the manufacturer for re-calibration. Results: At month zero 2 of 34 (5.9%), at month one 3 of 29 (10.3%), and at month four 0 of 33 (0.0%) tonometers fell within the manufacturer's recommended calibration range of ± 0.5 min Hg. A total of 14 of 34 (41.2%) tonometers at month zero, 10 of 29 (34.5%) tonometers at month one, and 17 of 33 (51.5%) tonometers at month four were identified to have calibration errors greater than ± 2.5 mm Hg. Conclusions: Goldmann applanation torrometers are not as accurate as the manufacturer's recommended calibration error tolerance of ± 0.5 mm Hg would suggest. Calibration error of less than ± 2.5 min Hg is clinically acceptable. Calibration error checks should be carried out once monthly and tonometers with calibration error greater than ± 2.5 mm Hg returned to the manufacturer for re-calibration. Additional checks should be made if tonometers suffer specific damage. Ideally individual ophthalmologists should check calibration before each session.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Sandhu SS, Chattopadhyay S, Birch MK, Ray-Chaudhuri N

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Glaucoma

Year: 2005

Volume: 14

Issue: 3

Pages: 215-218

ISSN (print): 1057-0829

ISSN (electronic): 1536-481X

Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200506000-00009

DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200506000-00009


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share