Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Michael Barnes
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The increasing use of botulinum toxin type-A, especially for focal dystonia and spasticity has highlighted the issue of secondary non-responsiveness. Within the last few years botulinum toxin type-B (Myobloc(R)(/Neurobloc(R)) has become commercially available as an alternative to type-A. This paper discusses our initial experience of botulinum toxin type-B in a total of 63 individuals who attended our botulinum clinic. Thirty-six patients had cervical dystonia and a secondary non-response to type-A toxin. Thirteen of these patients (36%) had a reasonable clinical response to Neurobloc(R) and continue to have injections. The other 23 patients either had no response, or a poor response, or had unacceptable side effects and ceased treatment. A small number of people with blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm and foot dystonia also had a disappointing response to injection. Twenty patients with spasticity were also type-A resistant. Seven of these show some continuing response to type-B, without unacceptable side effects. These findings demonstrate that botulinum toxin type-B has a place in the management of patients who have become non-responsive to type-A, but overall the responses to type-B toxin were disappointing.
Author(s): Barnes MP, Best D, Kidd L, Roberts B, Stark S, Weeks P, Whitaker J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: European Journal of Neurology
Year: 2005
Volume: 12
Issue: 12
Pages: 947-955
ISSN (print): 1351-5101
ISSN (electronic): 1468-1331
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01095.x
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01095.x
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric