Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Stephen Procter
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Scenarios and counterfactuals are two types of modal narrative. Modal narratives concern themselves with contingency and determinism: with questions of possibility and necessity. While scenarios are future-oriented, focused on what might yet be, counterfactuals are narratives of what might have been. Despite this fundamental temporal difference, consideration of the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of modal narratives as a genre enables us to elucidate some critical issues concerning scenarios as a foresight methodology. In particular, the scenario literature has tended to avoid extended discussion of its implicit assumptions concerning causation, necessity, possibility and contingency. By confronting the modal nature of foresight methodologies more explicitly, the futures community may begin to lay more secure philosophical foundations for their deployment. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Booth C, Rowlinson M, Clark P, Delahaye A, Procter S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Futures
Year: 2009
Volume: 41
Issue: 2
Pages: 87-95
ISSN (print): 0016-3287
ISSN (electronic): 1873-6378
Publisher: Pergamon
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.037
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.037
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
