Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The recovery of copper and tin from waste tin stripping solution Part II: Kinetic analysis of synthetic and real process waste

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Sudipta Roy, Rachel Buckle


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Tin stripping is a key process step in printed circuit board fabrication. At the end of a tin stripping process, in general, metal concentration in the waste is 2-40 g/l Cu and 150 g/I SnO2 [D. McKeeson, Print. Circuit Fabr. 22 (7) (1999) 34-37] in addition to nitric acid, ferric ions and other complexants. In a previous work we had carried out a thermodynamic analysis to determine if copper can be recovered from a tin stripping process. in this paper we present a kinetic analysis to determine the current efficiency for copper electrodeposition from a tin strip waste solution. We have performed electrochemical stripping analysis from simulated and real waste tin strip solutions. Copper is electrodeposited from solutions containing only copper and nitric acid, copper and nitric acid with ferric and tin ions, or waste from tin-strip processes. Our results showed that copper can be recovered at reasonably high current efficiency from solutions containing nitrate ions. The presence of ferric ions, however, reduces current efficiency significantly. It was shown that the tin stripping solution is a mixed potential system. In order to develop a high efficiency electrochemical copper recovery system, the crucial criteria are to maintain a low concentration of ferric ions in solution and to suppress the generation of ferric ions by electro-oxidation. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Roy S, Buckle R

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Separation and Purification Technology

Year: 2009

Volume: 68

Issue: 2

Pages: 185-192

ISSN (print): 1383-5866

ISSN (electronic): 1873-3794

Publisher: Pergamon


DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.05.005


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funder referenceFunder name