Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Mark WhittinghamORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Behavioural ecologists often study complex systems in which multiple hypotheses could be proposed to explain observed phenomena. For some systems, simple controlled experiments can be employed to reveal part of the complexity; often, however, observational studies that incorporate a multitude of causal factors may be the only (or preferred) avenue of study. We assess the value of recently advocated approaches to inference in both contexts. Specifically, we examine the use of information theoretic (IT) model selection using Akaike's information criterion (AIC). We find that, for simple analyses, the advantages of switching to an IT-AIC approach are likely to be slight, especially given recent emphasis on biological rather than statistical significance. By contrast, the model selection approach embodied by IT approaches offers significant advantages when applied to problems of more complex causality. Model averaging is an intuitively appealing extension to model selection. However, we were unable to demonstrate consistent improvements in prediction accuracy when using model averaging with IT-AIC; our equivocal results suggest that more research is needed on its utility. We illustrate our arguments with worked examples from behavioural experiments.
Author(s): Richards SA, Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Print publication date: 19/08/2010
ISSN (print): 0340-5443
ISSN (electronic): 1432-0762
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric