Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Alan McKinlay
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The formal negotiations process remains perhaps the least-studied moment of collective bargaining. Drawing on ideal types of ‘distributive’ and ‘integrative’ bargaining and the ‘formal/informal’ distinction, this article reports non-participant observation and ethnographic research into the negotiations process that enabled a change agreement in a British multinational, hereafter anonymised as FMCG. Informal bargaining relations provided the backdrop to—and emerged within—the formal negotiations process. Formal bargaining established new employment contracts based on a simplified internal labour market and generated the joint governance processes to enable and regulate the change process. Neither management nor union strategy was wholly derived from rational, interest-based positions. The negotiations process was essential to strategy formation and to the emergence of sufficient ‘integrative’ bargaining for all parties to devise and approve new processual institutions and norms to deliver a more flexible labour process and to restore the long-run viability for ‘distributive’ bargaining.
Author(s): Findlay P, McKinlay A, Marks A, Thompson P
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Industrial Relations Journal
ISSN (print): 0019-8692
ISSN (electronic): 1468-2338
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric