Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Sukhbinder Kumar,
Professor Tim GriffithsORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
A prevalent view of working memory (WM) considers it to be capacity-limited, fixed to a set number of items. However, recent shared resource models of WM have challenged this quantized account using measures of recall precision. Although this conceptual framework can account for several features of visual WM, it remains to be established whether it also applies to auditory WM. We used a novel pitch-matching paradigm to probe participants' memory of pure tones in sequences of varying length, and measured their precision of recall. Crucially, this provides an index of the variability of memory representation around its true value, rather than a binary yes/no recall measure typically used in change detection paradigms. We show that precision of auditory WM varies with both memory load and serial order. Moreover, auditory WM resources can be prioritized to cued items, improving precision of recall, but with a concomitant cost to other items, consistent with a resource model account.
Author(s): Kumar S, Joseph S, Pearson B, Teki S, Fox ZV, Griffiths TD, Husain M
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Cognitive Neuroscience
Print publication date: 21/08/2012
ISSN (print): 1758-8928
ISSN (electronic): 1758-8936
Publisher: Psychology Press
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric