Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Hayley Fowler
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Previous climate risk assessments provide important methodological insights into how to derive tractable research questions and the appropriate use of data under uncertainty, as well as identifying steps that benefit from stakeholder involvement. Here we propose the use of a framework for the systematic and objective exploration of climate risk assessments. The matrix facilitates a breakdown of information about aim and context, main results, methodological choices, stakeholder involvement, sources and characteristics of uncertainties and overall weaknesses. We then apply the matrix to three risk assessments in the water sector to explore some methodological strengths and weaknesses of approaches strongly linked to climate model outputs (top-down) versus those that originate from local knowledge of climate exposures (bottom-up), and demonstrate that closer integration with social and physical sciences is more likely to yield robust climate risk assessments. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Ekstrom M, Kuruppu N, Wilby RL, Fowler HJ, Chiew FHS, Dessai S, Young WJ
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Global Environmental Change
Year: 2013
Volume: 23
Issue: 1
Pages: 115-129
Print publication date: 01/02/2013
ISSN (print): 0959-3780
ISSN (electronic):
Publisher: Pergamon
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.003
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.003
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric