Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Kathryn Parkinson,
Dr Angela Jones,
Professor Ashley AdamsonORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Background Mothers' responses to questionnaire items assessing their child's weight status typically do not correspond to conventional clinical classifications based on body mass index (BMI). From this observation health professionals infer that mothers do not recognize overweight in their child. But the questions used have generally confounded factual judgements with values, so it is not clear whether the mothers are making factual errors, or differ from professionals in their values. Methods Cross-sectional study of population-based birth cohort at 6-8 years and their mothers (n = 540). An objective BMI matching task was used to determine the accuracy of mothers' recognition of their child's weight. Mothers matched their child to sex-and age-specific images of children of known BMI ranging from very thin to obese, and chose a descriptor of their child's weight of the kind used in previous research. Results Mothers tended to underestimate their child's BMI on the matching task. Matching errors significantly predicted mothers' description of their child's weight; those who overestimated their child's BMI on the matching task were more likely to say their child was overweight, while those who underestimated it were less likely to, independently of their child's actual BMI. Conclusions Educational programmes aimed at parents of young primary school children need to address separately the factual and the evaluative components of their assessment of child weight.
Author(s): Parkinson KN, Drewett RF, Jones AR, Adamson AJ, The Gateshead Millennium Study Core Team
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Child: Care Health and Development
Print publication date: 08/10/2013
ISSN (print): 0305-1862
ISSN (electronic): 1365-2214
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric