Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Jaap van Laar

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Objective. The 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) lack sensitivity for early SSc and limited cutaneous SSc. The present work, by a joint committee of the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), was undertaken for the purpose of developing new classification criteria for SSc. Methods. Using consensus methods, 23 candidate items were arranged in a multicriteria additive point system with a threshold to classify cases as SSc. The classification system was reduced by clustering items and simplifying weights. The system was tested by (1) determining specificity and sensitivity in SSc cases and controls with scleroderma-like disorders, and (2) validating against the combined view of a group of experts on a set of cases with or without SSc. Results. It was determined that skin thickening of the fingers extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient for the patient to be classified as having SSc; if that is not present, seven additive items apply, with varying weights for each: skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, Raynaud's phenomenon, and SSc-related autoantibodies. Sensitivity and specificity in the validation sample were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.92 for the new classification criteria and 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1980 ACR classification criteria. All selected cases were classified in accordance with consensus-based expert opinion. All cases classified as SSc according to the 1980 ACR criteria were classified as SSc with the new criteria, and several additional cases were now considered to be SSc. Conclusions. The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria for SSc and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.


Publication metadata

Author(s): van Laar JM; van den Hoogen F; Khanna D; Fransen J; Johnson SR; Baron M; Tyndall A; Matucci-Cerinic M; Naden RP; Medsger TA; Carreira PE; Riemekasten G; Clements PJ; Denton CP; Distler O; Allanore Y; Furst DE; Gabrielli A; Mayes MD; Seibold JR; Czirjak L; Steen VD; Inanc M; Kowal-Bielecka O; Muller-Ladner U; Valentini G; Veale DJ; Vonk MC; Walker UA; Chung L; Collier DH; Csuka ME; Fessler BJ; Guiducci S; Herrick A; Hsu VM; Jimenez S; Kahaleh B; Merkel PA; Sierakowski S; Silver RM; Simms RW; Varga J; Pope JE

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Year: 2013

Volume: 72

Issue: 11

Pages: 1747-1755

Print publication date: 01/11/2013

ISSN (print): 0003-4967

ISSN (electronic): 1468-2060

Publisher: BMJ Group

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424

DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
European League Against Rheumatism
Norton-Evans Fund for Scleroderma Research
Scleroderma Foundation
American College of Rheumatology
K24-AR-063120NIH (National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases)

Share