Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor John Sillince
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In this article we explain how the development of new organization theory faces several mutually reinforcing problems, which collectively suppress generative debate and the creation of new and alternative theories. We argue that to overcome these problems, researchers should adopt relationally reflexive practices. This does not lead to an alternative method but instead informs how methods are applied. Specifically, we advocate a stance toward the application of qualitative methods that legitimizes insights from the situated life-with-others of the researcher. We argue that this stance can improve our abilities for generative theorizing in the field of management and organization studies.
Author(s): Hibbert P, Sillince JAA, Diefenbach T, Cunliffe AL
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Organizational Research Methods
Year: 2014
Volume: 17
Issue: 3
Pages: 278-298
Print publication date: 01/07/2014
Online publication date: 11/03/2014
Acceptance date: 01/01/1900
ISSN (print): 1094-4281
ISSN (electronic): 1552-7425
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428114524829
DOI: 10.1177/1094428114524829
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric