Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr John Skelhorn
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Many caterpillars have conspicuous eye-like markings, called eyespots. Despite recent work demonstrating the efficacy of eyespots in deterring predator attack, a fundamental question remains: Given their protective benefits, why have eyespots not evolved in more caterpillars? Using a phylogenetically controlled analysis of hawkmoth caterpillars, we show that eyespots are associated with large body size. This relationship could arise because (i) large prey are innately conspicuous; (ii) large prey are more profitable, and thus face stronger selection to evolve such defenses; and/or (iii) eyespots are more effective on large-bodied prey. To evaluate these hypotheses, we exposed small and large caterpillar models with and without eyespots in a 2 x 2 factorial design to avian predators in the field. Overall, eyespots increased prey mortality, but the effect was particularly marked in small prey, and eyespots decreased mortality of large prey in some microhabitats. We then exposed artificial prey to naive domestic chicks in a laboratory setting following a 2 x 3 design (small or large size x no, small, or large eyespots). Predators attacked small prey with eyespots more quickly, but were more wary of large caterpillars with large eyespots than those without eyespots or with small eyespots. Taken together, these data suggest that eyespots are effective deterrents only when both prey and eyespots are large, and that innate aversion toward eyespots is conditional. We conclude that the distribution of eyespots in nature likely results from selection against eyespots in small caterpillars and selection for eyespots in large caterpillars (at least in some microhabitats).
Author(s): Hossie TJ, Skelhorn J, Breinholt JW, Kawahara AY, Sherratt TN
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Year: 2015
Volume: 112
Issue: 21
Pages: 6664-6669
Online publication date: 26/05/2015
Acceptance date: 14/04/2015
ISSN (print): 0027-8424
Publisher: National Academy of Sciences
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415121112
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1415121112
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric