Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Peter Eckersley, Professor Laurence Ferry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Between 2010 and 2015 the UK’s Coalition Government introduced directly-elected Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) to oversee English and Welsh police forces, and also required every force to publish a range of performance and financial information online. Together with the fact that front-line policing services have not been outsourced or privatised, this suggests that strong ‘downwards’ mechanisms exist through which residents can hold their local force to account. However, the new arrangements are significantly more complex than their predecessors, because many more actors are involved – several of which assume the role of both ‘principal’ and ‘agent’ in different accountability relationships. As a result, there is a substantial risk that the public do not have a clear understanding of roles and responsibilities, which makes it more difficult to hold officials to account for their actions. Such findings highlight how direct elections do not necessarily make public officials more accountable, and therefore have implications for other jurisdictions and sectors.
Author(s): Murphy P, Eckersley P, Ferry L
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Public Policy and Administration
Year: 2017
Volume: 32
Issue: 3
Pages: 197-213
Print publication date: 01/07/2017
Online publication date: 04/10/2016
Acceptance date: 29/08/2016
Date deposited: 28/10/2016
ISSN (print): 0952-0767
ISSN (electronic): 1749-4192
Publisher: Sage
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952076716671033
DOI: 10.1177/0952076716671033
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric