Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Matthew BrannanORCiD, Professor Steve VincentORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Meta-analysis has proved increasingly popular in management and organisation studies as a way of combining existing empirical quantitative research to generate a statistical estimate of how strongly variables are associated. Whilst a number of studies identify technical, procedural and practical limitations of meta-analyses, none have yet tackled the meta-theoretical flaws in this approach. We deploy critical realist meta-theory to argue that the individual quantitative studies, upon which meta-analysis relies, lack explanatory power because they are rooted in quasi-empiricist meta-theory. This problem, we argue, is carried over in meta-analyses. We then propose a ‘Critical Realist Synthesis’ as a potential alternative to the use of meta-analysis in organisation studies and social science more widely.
Author(s): Brannan M, Fleetwood S, O'Mahoney J, Vincent S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Human Relations
Year: 2017
Volume: 70
Issue: 1
Pages: 11-39
Print publication date: 01/01/2017
Online publication date: 11/11/2016
Acceptance date: 12/09/2016
Date deposited: 01/11/2016
ISSN (print): 0018-7267
ISSN (electronic): 1741-282X
Publisher: Sage
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726716674063
DOI: 10.1177/0018726716674063
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric