Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Timothy Lisle, Professor Brian Shaw, Dr Robert FrazerORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
The International Organisation for Standardisation ISO 6336:2006 and the American Gear Manufacturers Association AGMA 2101-D04 are the two most predominant empirically based analytical gear stress analysis methods for establishing contact and root bending stress in involute spur and helical gears. Although based on the same fundamental principles, they have evolved to such an extent that, for various reasons, they are not necessarily in agreement. The use of commercial universal numerical finite element software has become an increasingly popular alternative for gear stress analysis and this research compares the root bending stresses in external spur gears established using ISO 6336:2006, AGMA 2101-D04 and numerical finite element analysis (ANSYS) with experimental strain gauge validation.
Author(s): Lisle T, Shaw BA, Frazer RC
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Mechanism and Machine Theory
Year: 2017
Volume: 111
Pages: 1-9
Print publication date: 01/05/2017
Online publication date: 18/01/2017
Acceptance date: 10/01/2017
Date deposited: 27/01/2017
ISSN (print): 0094-114X
ISSN (electronic): 1873-3999
Publisher: Pergamon Press
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.01.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.01.006
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric