Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Artificial grammar learning in vascular and progressive non-fluent aphasias

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Thomas Cope, Dr Ben Wilson, Lauren Dean, Dr Manon Grube, Professor Tim GriffithsORCiD, Professor Christopher Petkov



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


© 2017 The Authors Patients with non-fluent aphasias display impairments of expressive and receptive grammar. This has been attributed to deficits in processing configurational and hierarchical sequencing relationships. This hypothesis had not been formally tested. It was also controversial whether impairments are specific to language, or reflect domain general deficits in processing structured auditory sequences. Here we used an artificial grammar learning paradigm to compare the abilities of controls to participants with agrammatic aphasia of two different aetiologies: stroke and frontotemporal dementia. Ten patients with non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), 12 with non-fluent aphasia due to stroke, and 11 controls implicitly learned a novel mixed-complexity artificial grammar designed to assess processing of increasingly complex sequencing relationships. We compared response profiles for otherwise identical sequences of speech tokens (nonsense words) and tone sweeps. In all three groups the ability to detect grammatical violations varied with sequence complexity, with performance improving over time and being better for adjacent than non-adjacent relationships. Patients performed less well than controls overall, and this was related more strongly to aphasia severity than to aetiology. All groups improved with practice and performed well at a control task of detecting oddball nonwords. Crucially, group differences did not interact with sequence complexity, demonstrating that aphasic patients were not disproportionately impaired on complex structures. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed that response patterns were very similar across all three groups, but very different between the nonsense word and tone tasks, despite identical artificial grammar structures. Overall, we demonstrate that agrammatic aphasics of two different aetiologies are not disproportionately impaired on complex sequencing relationships, and that the learning of phonological and non-linguistic sequences occurs independently. The similarity of profiles of discriminatory abilities and rule learning across groups suggests that insights from previous studies of implicit sequence learning in vascular aphasia are likely to prove applicable in nfvPPA.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Cope TE, Wilson B, Robson H, Drinkall R, Dean L, Grube M, Jones PS, Patterson K, Griffiths TD, Rowe JB, Petkov CI

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Neuropsychologia

Year: 2017

Volume: 104

Pages: 201-213

Print publication date: 01/09/2017

Online publication date: 24/08/2017

Acceptance date: 17/08/2017

Date deposited: 29/09/2017

ISSN (print): 0028-3932

ISSN (electronic): 1873-3514

Publisher: Elsevier Ltd


DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.022


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funder referenceFunder name
Wellcome Trust