Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Emeritus Professor Simon Gibbs
This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Routledge, 2020.
For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
In this paper, we report an investigation of the possible influence on teachers’ essentialist thinking and efficacy beliefs of category labels used to describe children’s educational difficulties. A 2x2x2 counterbalanced design was employed in which primary school teachers in Finland and the UK were exposed to vignettes that portrayed a child exhibiting difficulties in one of two domains: either behaviour or reading. Vignettes were presented in two versions. In one, the child was labelled as having either ‘ADHD’ or ‘Dyslexia’; in the alternate condition no such label was ascribed, descriptions identical in all other respects. Participating teachers were presented with two vignettes, one from each domain and in each condition. Responses to measures of Efficacy and Essentialist beliefs were solicited. Overall responses indicated that category labels evoked stronger essentialist beliefs but did not influence teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Finnish teachers reported stronger essentialist and lower efficacy beliefs than their counterparts in the UK.
Author(s): Gibbs S, Beckman JS, Elliott J, Metsapelto RL, Vehkakoski T, Aro M
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: European Journal of Special Needs Education
Year: 2020
Volume: 35
Issue: 1
Pages: 115-127
Online publication date: 18/08/2019
Acceptance date: 25/07/2019
Date deposited: 26/07/2019
ISSN (print): 0885-6257
ISSN (electronic): 1469-591X
Publisher: Routledge
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1652441
DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2019.1652441
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric