Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Retirement ages of senior UK doctors: National surveys of the medical graduates of 1974 and 1977

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Fay SmithORCiD



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


© 2018 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Objective To report on retirement ages of two cohorts of senior doctors in the latter stages of their careers. Design Questionnaires sent in 2014 to all medical graduates of 1974 and 1977. Setting UK. Participants 3695 UK medical graduates. Main outcome measures Retirement status by age at the time of the survey and age at retirement if retired. Planned retirement ages and retirement plans if not retired. Results Of contactable doctors, 85% responded. 43.7% of all responding doctors had fully retired, 25.9% had retired and returned' for some medical work, 18.3% had not retired and were working full-time in medicine, 10.7% had not retired and were working part-time in medicine and 1.4% were either doing non-medical work or did not give details of their employment status. The average actual retirement age (including those who had retired but subsequently returned) was 59.6 years (men 59.9, women 58.9). Psychiatrists (58.3) and general practitioners (GPS) (59.5) retired at a slightly younger age than radiologists (60.4), surgeons (60.1) and hospital specialists (60.0). More GPS (54%) than surgeons (26%) or hospital medical specialists (34%) were fully retired, and there were substantial variations in retirement rates in other specialties. Sixty-three per cent of women GPS were fully retired. Conclusions Gender and specialty differences in retirement ages were apparent and are worthy of qualitative study to establish underlying reasons in those specialties where earlier retirement is more common. There is a general societal expectation that people will retire at increasingly elderly ages; but the doctors in this national study retired relatively young.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Smith F, Goldacre MJ, Lambert TW

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: BMJ Open

Year: 2018

Volume: 8

Issue: 6

Print publication date: 01/06/2018

Online publication date: 27/06/2018

Acceptance date: 24/05/2018

Date deposited: 24/05/2019

ISSN (electronic): 2044-6055

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group


DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022475


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funder referenceFunder name
commissioned and funded by the NIHR Policy Research Programme (project number 016/0118).