Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Development and piloting of four decision aids for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in different media formats

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Richard Thomson


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLCBackground: Using DAs for preference-sensitive decisions is an evidence-based way to improve patient-centered decisions. Reimbursement mandates have increased the need for DAs in ICD care, although none have been formally evaluated. The objectives were to develop and pilot implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) decision aids (DAs) for patients considering primary prevention ICDs. Methods: Development Phase: An expert panel, including patients and physicians, iteratively developed four DAs: a one-page Option GridTM conversation aid, a four-page in-depth paper tool, a 17-minute video, and an interactive website. Trial Phase: At three sites, patients with heart failure who were eligible for primary prevention ICDs were randomly assigned 2:1 to intervention (received DAs) or control (usual care). We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation exploring acceptability and feasibility. Results: Twenty-one eligible patients enrolled (15 intervention). Most intervention participants found the DAs to be unbiased (67%), helpful (89%), and would recommend them to others (100%). The pilot was feasible at all sites; however, using clinic staff to identify eligible patients was more efficient than chart review. Although the main goals were to measure acceptability and feasibility, intervention participants trended towards increased concordance between longevity values and ICD decisions (71% concordant vs. 29%, p =.06). Participants preferred the in-depth paper tool and video DAs. Access to a nurse during the decision-making window encouraged questions and improved participant-perceived confidence. Conclusions: Participants felt the DAs provided helpful, balanced information that they would recommend to other patients. Further exploration of this larger context of DA use and strategies to promote independent use related to electrophysiology (EP) visits are needed.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Wallace BC, Jones J, Masoudi FA, Nowels CT, Varosy P, Thomson R, Elwyn G, Brega AG, Vermilye T, Knoepke CE, Sandhu A, Allen LA, Matlock DD

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Year: 2021

Volume: 44

Issue: 11

Pages: 1842-1852

Print publication date: 01/11/2021

Online publication date: 16/09/2021

Acceptance date: 12/09/2021

ISSN (print): 0147-8389

ISSN (electronic): 1540-8159

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.


DOI: 10.1111/pace.14365

PubMed id: 34528271


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric