Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Simon BarrettORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Social prescribing schemes refer people toward personalized health/wellbeing interventions in local communities. Since schemes hold different representations of social prescribing, responses to the pandemic crisis will vary. Intersectionality states that social divisions build on one another, sustaining unequal health outcomes. We conducted and inductively analysed interviews with twenty-three professional and volunteer stakeholders across three social prescribing schemes in urban and rural Scotland at the start and end of year one of the pandemic. Concerns included identifying and digitally supporting disadvantaged and vulnerable individuals and reduced capacity statutory and third-sector services, obliging link workers to assume new practical and psychological responsibilities. Social prescribing services in Scotland, we argue, represent a collage of practices superimposed on a struggling healthcare system. Those in need of such services are unlikely to break through disadvantage whilst situated within a social texture wherein inequalities of education, health and environmental arrangements broadly intersect with one another.
Author(s): Fixsen A, Barrett S, Shimanovich M
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Qualitative Health Research
Year: 2022
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 670-682
Print publication date: 01/03/2022
Online publication date: 30/12/2021
Acceptance date: 04/12/2021
Date deposited: 04/01/2022
ISSN (print): 1049-7323
ISSN (electronic): 1552-7557
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211064229
DOI: 10.1177/10497323211064229
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric