Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Heather Brown, Dr Mandy Cheetham, Professor Suzanne Moffatt, Dr Steph MorrisORCiD, Dr Huasheng XiangORCiD, Professor Clare Bambra

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. INTRODUCTION: The UK social security system is being transformed by the implementation of Universal Credit (UC), which combines six existing benefits and tax credits into a single payment for low-income households. Despite extensive reports of hardship associated with the introduction of UC, no previous studies have comprehensively evaluated its impact on mental health. Because payments are targeted at low-income households, impacts on mental health will have important consequences for health inequalities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a mixed methods study. Work package (WP) 1 will compare health outcomes for new recipients of UC with outcomes for legacy benefit recipients in two large population surveys, using the phased rollout of UC as a natural experiment. We will also analyse the relationship between the proportion of UC claimants in small areas and a composite measure of mental health. WP2 will use data collected by Citizen's Advice to explore the sociodemographic and health characteristics of people who seek advice when claiming UC and identify features of the claim process that prompt advice-seeking. WP3 will conduct longitudinal in-depth interviews with up to 80 UC claimants in England and Scotland to explore reasons for claiming and experiences of the claim process. Up to 30 staff supporting claimants will also be interviewed. WP4 will use a dynamic microsimulation model to simulate the long-term health impacts of different implementation scenarios. WP5 will undertake cost-consequence analysis of the potential costs and outcomes of introducing UC and cost-benefit analyses of mitigating actions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We obtained ethical approval for the primary data gathering from the University of Glasgow, College of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee, application number 400200244. We will use our networks to actively disseminate findings to UC claimants, the public, practitioners and policy-makers, using a range of methods and formats. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered with the Research Registry: researchregistry6697.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Craig P, Barr B, Baxter AJ, Brown H, Cheetham M, Gibson M, Katikireddi SV, Moffatt S, Morris S, Munford LA, Richiardi M, Sutton M, Taylor-Robinson D, Wickham S, Xiang H, Bambra C

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: BMJ Open

Year: 2022

Volume: 12

Issue: 4

Online publication date: 08/04/2022

Acceptance date: 09/03/2022

Date deposited: 25/04/2022

ISSN (print): 2044-6055

ISSN (electronic): 2044-6055

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group

URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061340

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061340

PubMed id: 35396318


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
200335/Z/15/Z
949582
MC_UU_00022/2
MR/P008577/1
PD-SPH-2015
MR/S037578/1
NIHR131709
NIHR200173
NIHR200174
NIHR200182
SCAF/15/02
SPHSU17

Share