Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Wee Chan Au
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
Popular representations of remote work often depict it as a flexible, technologically feasible, and family-friendly work arrangement. Have the images of remote working as a desirable work arrangement been challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic? What have we learned from the widespread involuntary remote work imposed on many employees during this time? To answer these questions, we analysed 40 recent empirical studies that examined work-life balance while working from home during the pandemic. Our analysis was informed by the person-environment fit theory and complemented by literature reviews on remote work conducted prior to the pandemic. We found four themes representing misfits between desirable expectations and the undesirable realities of remote work: (1) flextime vs. work intensity, (2) flexplace vs. space limitation, (3) technologically-feasible work arrangements. technostress and isolation, and (4) family-friendly work arrangement vs. housework and care intensity. We highlight the important role HRD practitioners can play in assisting employees to achieve a fit between their expectations and experiences of remote work.
Author(s): Shirmohammadi M, Au WC, Beigi M
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Human Resource Development International
Year: 2022
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 163-181
Online publication date: 10/03/2022
Acceptance date: 24/02/2022
Date deposited: 03/08/2022
ISSN (print): 1367-8868
ISSN (electronic): 1469-8374
Publisher: Routledge
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047380
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2022.2047380
See more details
