Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Alan McKinlay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.How do managerial bureaucracies emerge? We consider this central question of Chandlerian business history by examining how Tata and Sons governed its steelmaking company TISCO, 1907–1925. Tata had no steelmaking knowledge and was reliant upon American expertise and personnel. This knowledge imbalance skewed power in favour of autocratic American steelmasters who wielded complete operational control. Unable to impose its will on TISCO, Tata was forced to govern through everyday diplomacy. Through everyday diplomacy, Tata introduced accounting routines to establish a hierarchy and render the American steelmasters accountable to the parent company. Every administrative and accounting process suggested by Tata’s diplomat, B.J. Padshah, was resisted by the American steelmasters as an erosion of their absolute power. We contribute to our understanding of how a uniquely Indian type of enterprise, the managing agency, governed their loosely coupled subsidiaries. We extend Foucault’s power/knowledge by introducing everyday diplomacy as the vehicle for establishing organisational discipline.
Author(s): McKinlay A, Masrani S, Pezet E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Business History
Year: 2024
Volume: 66
Issue: 6
Pages: 1602-1626
Online publication date: 25/01/2023
Acceptance date: 30/11/2022
Date deposited: 09/02/2023
ISSN (print): 0007-6791
ISSN (electronic): 1743-7938
Publisher: Routledge
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2022.2155142
DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2022.2155142
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric