Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Ted Schrecker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
A dramatic increase in the volume of research literature referencing social determinants of health (SDH) since the report of the World Health Organization Commission on the topic in 2008 has not been matched by expansion of policies and interventions to reduce health inequalities by way of SDH. This article argues that familiar hierarchies of evidence that privilege clinical epidemiology as used in evidence-based medicine are inappropriate to address SDH. They misunderstand both the range of relevant evidence and the value-based nature of standards of proof. A richer conceptual armamentarium is available; it includes several applications of the concepts of epidemiological worlds and the lifecourse, which are explained in the article. A more appropriate evidentiary approach to SDH and health inequalities requires “downing the master's tools,” to adapt Audre Lorde's phrase, and instead applying a multidisciplinary approach to assessing the evidence that adequately reflects the complexity of the relevant causal pathways. Doing so is made more difficult by the power structures that shape research priorities, yet it is essential.
Author(s): Schrecker T
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services
Year: 2023
Volume: 53
Issue: 3
Pages: 253-265
Online publication date: 09/04/2023
Acceptance date: 10/01/2023
Date deposited: 18/04/2023
ISSN (print): 2755-1938
ISSN (electronic): 2755-1946
Publisher: Sage
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938231161932
DOI: 10.1177/27551938231161932
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric