Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Analyzing who is relevant to engage in environmental decision-making processes by interests, influence and impact: The 3i framework

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Helen Kendall, Marian Raley

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2024 The AuthorsOutcomes in participatory environmental processes are strongly affected by choices about who is engaged. Inclusive engagement diversifies the range of interests and perspectives represented, including those from vulnerable and marginalized groups, ultimately contributing to more socially and environmentally sustainable and equitable outcomes. However, existing “stakeholder analysis” methods often bias participant identification away from disenfranchised groups with limited pre-existing interest or influence, instead favoring the most easily accessed and influential stakeholders. This paper draws on research impact theory and practice to propose a new, more inclusive approach, adding impact to the existing interest and influence criteria (which each begin with the letter “i", hence the 3i framework) that are typically used to identify, categorize and prioritize those who are relevant to be included or excluded from engagement processes. As part of this proposed 3i analysis approach, we articulate a new typology of relevant parties to engage in environmental decision-making processes, including: uninterested; uninterested and impacted; uninterested influencers; disinterested, influential and impacted; only interested; interested and impacted; interested influencers; and interested, influential and impacted. Except for the first group, all types of relevant parties should be considered for engagement wherever possible, with participation strategies tailored to their specific 3i profile. The approach was developed and refined through a series of workshops before developing it into a survey instrument that was piloted to gather 3i data efficiently across several national contexts. Survey findings are presented for a case study identifying those relevant to wetland and peatland restoration in a Scottish catchment. If widely adopted, the 3i framework would be the most consequential change in stakeholder analysis methods since the introduction of interest-influence matrices in the 1980s.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Reed MS, Jensen EA, Noles S, Conneely D, Kendall H, Raley M, Tarrant A, Oakley N, Hinson C, Hoare V, Marshall K, Pugliese L

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Environmental Management

Year: 2025

Volume: 373

Print publication date: 01/01/2025

Online publication date: 05/12/2024

Acceptance date: 21/11/2024

Date deposited: 16/12/2024

ISSN (print): 0301-4797

ISSN (electronic): 1095-8630

Publisher: Academic Press

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123437

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123437

Data Access Statement: Data will be made available on request.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
101056848
101177493
BB/V011561/1
EU Horizon Europe
UK Research and Innovation
Scottish Government's Strategic Research Programme

Share