Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Statistical and Health Economic Analysis Plan for a Secure Care Hospital Evaluation of Manualized (interpersonal) Art-psychotherapy: the SCHEMA Randomized Controlled Trial

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Iain McKinnonORCiD, Toni Harrison, Arman Iranpour, Dr Simon Hackett

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

Background: The SCHEMA trial evaluates whether interpersonal art psychotherapy reduces the frequency/severity of aggressive incidents or patient distress associated with psychiatric symptoms, compared to usual care. Objective To describe the statistical and health economic analysis plan. Methods A multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group, single blind individually randomised controlled trial with 150 adults within NHS secure care who have borderline to mild/moderate intellectual disability. The primary outcome is the frequency/severity of aggressive behaviour, measured on the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) 19 weeks post-randomisation, analysed using a linear mixed-effect model, adjusted for baseline MOAS and stratification by gender and psychosis diagnosis. Changes in aggressive behaviour will be evaluated using weekly MOAS scores between 19 and 38 weeks. Patient distress relating to psychiatric symptoms will be assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory Positive Symptom Distress Index across baseline, 19, and 38 weeks. Health-related quality-of-life will be assessed using self- and proxy-reported EQ-5D three-level (EQ-5D-3L) and Recovering Quality of Life 10-item measures, the latter to estimate the ReQoL Utility Index, across baseline, 19, and 38 weeks. The self-reported EQ-5D-3L is collected using an adapted version for people with intellectual disabilities. Resource-use is collected based on secure care records, to estimate intervention and healthcare costs over 19 and 38 weeks. HRQoL and cost data will inform cost-effectiveness based on the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year over 38 weeks. Discussion This paper details the planned analyses and discusses recruitment challenges, sample size implications, and effect size assumptions. The plan was developed prior to database lock and unblinding to minimise analytical bias.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Condie J, Franklin M, Aafjes-van Doorn K, Foscarini-Craggs P, McKinnon I, Harrison TL, Iranpour A, Zubala A, Rose S, Randell E, McNamara R, Riaz M, Hackett S

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Trials

Year: 2025

Volume: 26

Online publication date: 01/07/2025

Acceptance date: 11/06/2025

Date deposited: 05/07/2025

ISSN (electronic): 1745-6215

Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08934-3

DOI: 10.1186/s13063-025-08934-3

Data Access Statement: Not applicable.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Integrated Clinical Academic (ICA) Programme, Grant Reference Number NIHR301264

Share