Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Herbicide application indirectly affects non-crop plant–pollinator networks in agroecosystems

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Darren Evans

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Ecology © 2025 British Ecological Society.In agroecosystems, non-crop plants support biodiversity and ecosystem services but can also challenge agricultural productivity, resulting in many of them being referred to as weeds. Herbicides, commonly used to manage these weed species, can influence wider non-crop plant communities by causing the loss of susceptible species and fostering herbicide-resistant ones. These changes in plant communities can propagate through all trophic levels in the community, ultimately impacting biodiversity and ecosystem functions such as pollination. We used agent-based modelling to simulate long-term changes in non-crop plant communities in field margins, aiming to predict their indirect effects on plant–pollinator interaction networks under different herbicide application programmes. Specifically, we compared three programmes ranging from lower to higher risks of plants developing resistance. The model used empirical data from field studies and was parameterised using combinations of different herbicide, plant and agronomic (i.e. management practices) traits. Over a 30-year simulation period, we evaluated shifts in the structure of plant–pollinator networks, assessing metrics such as species richness, connectance, interaction evenness, nestedness and robustness. Herbicide application led to significant changes in both plant and pollinator species diversity, leading to knock-on negative effects on the structure and potential function of plant–pollinator networks in non-crop areas. Despite all scenarios negatively impacting plant–pollinator networks, more intensive management practices produced more pronounced effects. Synthesis and applications: Our approach provides insights into how herbicide management strategies negatively influence biodiversity and the resilience of plant–pollinator interactions over time, indirectly risking ecosystem functioning and services. Strategies for weed control should aim at reducing herbicide use by combining chemical methods with alternative practices that mitigate risks, such as crop rotation and cover crops. A broader ecological perspective is essential for creating sustainable policies that balance weed control with biodiversity conservation in agroecosystems.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Tavella J, Windsor F, Oreja F, Rother DC, Monasterolo M, Palacios TP, Tognetti P, Omacini M, Guimaraes PR, Evans DM, Devoto M

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Applied Ecology

Year: 2025

Volume: 62

Issue: 9

Pages: 2237-2248

Print publication date: 01/09/2025

Online publication date: 16/07/2025

Acceptance date: 27/06/2025

Date deposited: 11/08/2025

ISSN (print): 0021-8901

ISSN (electronic): 1365-2664

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70113

DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.70113

ePrints DOI: 10.57711/qba1-0s50

Data Access Statement: Data and code available via the Zenodo data repository https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15823804 (Tavella et al., 2025). R code is also available at GitHub https://github.com/JuliTavella/Herbicides_pollinators_JAE.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Grant Number: PICT 2017-4111
Royal Society. Grant Number: CHL\R1\180156
Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture
Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Grant Number: 20020170100778BA

Share