Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The association between polypharmacy and mortality in patients with heart failure: Results from the PULSE dataset

Lookup NU author(s): Janine Beezer, Professor Adam ToddORCiD, Dr Andrew KingstonORCiD, Professor Andy HusbandORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2025 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.Aims: Mortality remains high in heart failure despite advances in heart failure therapy. Heart failure patients are generally older, with multiple long-term conditions, and polypharmacy is common. This study explores the association between polypharmacy and mortality. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study collected medication data on admission and discharge from the first heart failure hospitalisation. Association with mortality was explored using Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability weighting regression analysis. Results: A total of 660 patients were included, 367 (56%) male, mean age 76.1 (SD ±12.3) and almost 60% (338/660) had died at study end. Median follow-up time was 2.9 years (25th and 75th quartiles 1.6 and 4.5). It was rare to be discharged from hospital with no polypharmacy (5%, n = 31). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was associated with a 32% (HR 1.32, CI 1.08–1.61, P = 0.007) higher mortality compared to HFrEF. In those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), univariable analysis showed hyperpolypharmacy was associated with twice the mortality compared to polypharmacy (HR 1.95, CI 1.36–2.82, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the association between polypharmacy and mortality was lost. The average treatment effect for hyperpolypharmacy was associated with 26% (Coeff. −0.26, CI −0.43 to −0.09, P = 0.003) higher mortality than polypharmacy. The chance of survival to the end of follow-up was 80% (Coeff. 0.80, CI 0.64–0.95, P < 0.01) for those with polypharmacy, and 54% (Coeff. 0.54, CI 0.46–0.61, P < 0.01) for those with hyperpolypharmacy. In HFpEF, hyperpolypharmacy, univariable analysis was not associated with mortality (HR 0.93, CI 0.70–1.24, P = 0.63). Average treatment effect also showed that hyperpolypharmacy was not associated with mortality (Coeff. −0.03, CI −0.15 to 0.08, P = 0.55). The chance of survival to the end of follow-up was 67% (Coeff. 0.67, CI 0.58–0.77, P < 0.01) with polypharmacy and 64% (Coeff. 0.64, CI 0.57–0.71, P < 0.01) with hyperpolypharmacy. Conclusions: Age, sex, CCI, and CFS are strong mortality predictors for HF irrespective of HF subgroup. Rigorous confounding adjustment suggests polypharmacy is associated with mortality following hospitalisation for HFrEF but not HFpEF. Further studies are needed to address the complex interplay between polypharmacy, age, comorbidity, and frailty.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Beezer J, Clark AL, Todd A, Kingston A, Husband A

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: ESC Heart Failure

Year: 2025

Pages: Epub ahead of print

Online publication date: 11/10/2025

Acceptance date: 22/09/2025

Date deposited: 27/10/2025

ISSN (electronic): 2055-5822

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15445

DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.15445

Data Access Statement: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

PubMed id: 41074682


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share