Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Are There Socio-Demographic Inequalities in the Utilisation of Tumour and ctDNA Somatic Mutation Testing in Solid Tumours? A Systematic Review

Lookup NU author(s): Sarah Rae, Dr Ruth Norris, Professor Alastair GreystokeORCiD, Professor Linda SharpORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Introduction: Somatic mutation testing in solid tumours represents a rapidly advancing field which increases opportunities for access to molecularly targeted therapeutics and clinical trials. This systematic review determined whether socio-demographic inequalities affect utilisation of novel somatic mutation testing. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidance, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed and PsycINFO were searched for peer-reviewed studies (January 2018–March 2025). Data was extracted reporting utilisation of novel somatic mutation testing panels, including Oncotype DX, for solid tumours by socio-demographic measures. A modified International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) checklist assessed study quality. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated where needed and narrative synthesis undertaken. Data was stratified by receipt of Oncotype DX testing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Results: The 27,749 citations screened identified 24 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. These reported on two modalities of testing (Oncotype DX and other NGS sequencing panels) across five cancers. Twenty-three studies were from US populations. These highlighted disparities in utility of testing across socio-demographic measures and particularly decreased utilisation with increased age, non-white ethnicity, lower socio-economic status, and non-private insurance. The mean study quality score by a modified ISPOR checklist was 8.3/10. Conclusion: These results provide a contemporary update on evidence of disparities in access to novel genomic testing. As an expanding field, this requires further investigation to prevent accentuations in inequitable implementation of precision oncology and differences in outcomes between different socio-demographic groups.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Rae S, Baldwin A, Lagonera MJ, Norris R, Greystoke A, Sharp L

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Cancer Medicine

Year: 2026

Volume: 15

Issue: 3

Print publication date: 01/03/2026

Online publication date: 13/03/2026

Acceptance date: 15/01/2026

Date deposited: 23/03/2026

ISSN (electronic): 2045-7634

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71668

DOI: 10.1002/cam4.71668

Data Access Statement: All data utilised is available from the authors on reasonable request


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
National Institute for Healthand Care Research
NIHRNewcastle Patient Safety Research Collaboration

Share