Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Systematic review on the design and methodology of the pediatric direct oral anticoagulant clinical trials for thrombosis prevention: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Tina Biss

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2026 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.Background Prevention of thromboembolism (TE) remains a priority in children with a high thrombotic risk. While recent trials using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for TE prevention have been completed, these trials had significant limitations. Objectives This study reviewed the methodology of pediatric DOAC trials for TE prevention to identify design and execution challenges and opportunities for improvement. Methods We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov , from January 2002 to April 2025, to identify pediatric trials evaluating DOACs for TE prevention. We compared registered information in clinicaltrials.gov , trial design manuscripts, and final result manuscripts of pivotal TE prevention DOAC trials to highlight changes in methods, study duration, and outcomes. Results Eight publications from 4 trials (1 design and 1 final manuscript each) were included. Each trial targeted a pediatric subpopulation: 3 in cardiac disease and 1 in oncology. Together, 984 children enrolled in the 4 trials. All trials had some modification to methdology from original design, including changes in eligibility criteria, sample size, timing of end point ascertainment, outcomes, and analysis. All but 1 required a longer duration to complete than planned. Only 1 trial had definitive statistical power calculations. Conclusion The pediatric DOAC trials for TE prevention provide an opportunity to understand the unique successes and limitations in studying TE prevention in children. Given lack of power, inconsistent definitions, and limited follow-up duration, questions remain regarding safety, dose intensity, end points, and appropriate selection of high-risk populations. Future research should use innovative methods to overcome these limitations.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Whitworth H, Betensky M, Bhat RV, Al-Ghafry M, Amankwah EK, Biss TT, Brandao L, Chan A, Holzhauer S, Kiskaddon AL, Klaassen ILM, Monagle P, Raffini L, Revel-Vilk S, Sharathkumar A, Sochet AA, van Ommen CH, Male C, Goldenberg NA

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Year: 2026

Issue: ePub ahead of Print

Online publication date: 20/03/2026

Acceptance date: 16/03/2026

ISSN (print): 1538-7933

ISSN (electronic): 1538-7836

Publisher: Elsevier B.V.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2026.03.011

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2026.03.011

PubMed id: 41865887


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share