ePrints

Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits

Lookup NU author(s): Helen Bird, Professor David Howard, Dr Susan Franklin

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.

Abstract

Semantic category effects, such as difficulties in naming animate things relative to inanimate objects, have been explained in terms of the relative weightings of perceptual and functional features within the semantic representations of these concepts. We argue that grammatical category deficits, such as difficulties in naming nouns relative to verbs, can be explained within the same framework. We hypothesize that verb concepts are richer in functional than sensory features and present a model of the semantic representations of animate nouns, inanimate nouns, and verbs. The model demonstrates that sensory feature damage results in a deficit for naming living things but spares verb naming, and functional feature damage results in a deficit for naming inanimate objects and verbs. We then report the assessment results of two patient groups. In accordance with the model's predictions, the 'verb spared' patients were consistently worse at naming living things than inanimate objects, and their definitions of both living and nonliving items were lacking in sensory information. We conclude that damage to sensory features in semantic representations causes difficulties in naming concrete nouns relative to action verbs, and within the grammatical category of nouns, animate items will be more severely affected. Imageability was shown to be a strong predictor of naming performance in the 'verb deficit' patients, and when this variable was controlled no class effect remained. Production of definitions revealed no differential damage to sensory or functional features, and no consistent effect of animacy in naming was shown. While the model suggests that verb deficits might occur in patients for whom functional features are damaged relative to sensory features, we conclude that the 'verb deficit' shown in our patients (and potentially in many previously reported cases) was an artifact of the lower imageability of verbs in confrontation naming tasks. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Bird H, Howard D, Franklin S

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Brain and Language

Year: 2000

Volume: 72

Issue: 3

Pages: 246-309

ISSN (print): 0093-934X

ISSN (electronic): 1090-2155

Publisher: Academic Press

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2292

DOI: 10.1006/brln.2000.2292

PubMed id: 10764520

Altmetrics

Share