Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Janice McLaughlinORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This paper identifies common ground in feminist and disability movement concerns with the social and ethical implications of antenatal screening and abortion. By examining the frameworks used by particular authors within each area, I argue that they both can and do have a shared agenda, which is focused on the social values that are embedded in antenatal screening and promote abortion as the obvious choice to the diagnosis of a congenital condition. It is important to develop some kind of shared agenda in order to construct theoretical and methodological approaches, which pay equal attention to pregnant women (disabled and non-disabled) and disabled people. To aid the development of such an agenda I draw on Actor Network Theory (ANT), which focuses on analysing the role of sociotechnical networks in securing particular social values and moral worlds. The issue for both disability studies and feminism is what kind of screening networks produce moral worlds that promote abortion, shape women's choices and express discrimination against disabled people?
Author(s): McLaughlin J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Disability and Society
Print publication date: 01/05/2003
ISSN (print): 0968-7599
ISSN (electronic): 1360-0508
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric