Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

A comparative study of the design of synchronous and asynchronous self-checking RISC processors

Lookup NU author(s): Peter Hyde, Dr Gordon Russell

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

The use of deep sub-micron technology raises a number of concerns about reliability in VLSI circuits. Shrinking geometries and reduced power supplies leave the circuits vulnerable to 'soft' and transient errors. The combination of high clock speed and large circuit area result in high power consumption and skew in clock distribution. This paper investigates the use of Concurrent Error Detection (CED) and asynchronous design to overcome these problems. Four pipelined processor designs are compared - two synchronous, two asynchronous with one of each type using CED. Initial results indicate an area overhead of 12% in return for a fault coverage of 98.54% of all unidirectional errors. Additionally, the asynchronous CED processor has an area overhead of only 4% when compared to the synchronous non-CED design.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Hyde PD, Russell G

Publication type: Conference Proceedings (inc. Abstract)

Publication status: Published

Conference Name: 10th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium (IOLTS 2004)

Year of Conference: 2004

Pages: 89-94

Publisher: IEEE

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/OLT.2004.1319664

DOI: 10.1109/OLT.2004.1319664

Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item

ISBN: 0769521800


Share