Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Bryan BurfordORCiD, Professor Tim Rapley, Dr Sarah SowdenORCiD, Dr Alison Steven, Professor Gill VanceORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. BACKGROUND: The work of receptionists in general practice is evolving rapidly and becoming more complex due to a number of changes within primary and community care services, such as increased digitalisation. In under-served areas, these changes have been further complicated by under-resourcing and workforce challenges around staff recruitment and retention. The National Health Service (NHS) 10-year health plan is set to accelerate further significant changes. There is limited understanding about how and why these changes and workforce challenges are impacting and will impact the future work of receptionists in general practice in under-served areas. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This realist review will build on an existing programme theory related to general practitioner workforce sustainability. The review will examine what works, for whom, how and under what circumstances for receptionist work in general practice, in under-served areas. For example, how influences such as the expectations of patients (in under-served communities), poor staffing or limited career progression. Key stakeholders, including public contributors and individuals from general practice settings, will inform the realist review.The review will be conducted using existing secondary and grey literature sources. The search strategy comprises five electronic databases: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE, SSCI, AHCI) with a date limit of 2015 applied to the search. The review will follow Pawson's five steps: (1) shaping the scope of the review; (2) searching for evidence; (3) document selection and appraisal; (4) data extraction and (5) data synthesis. The findings will be reported in accordance with the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis Evolving Standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not needed for secondary analysis. The findings of this review will contribute to ongoing work as part of our 'Workforce Voices' programme of research. They will be disseminated to policymakers, commissioners, providers of health and social care and primary care and community healthcare teams through peer-reviewed publications, members of the public, conference presentations, social media and recommendations.
Author(s): Hoverd E, Brown MEL, Burford B, Chen K-L, Erfani G, Hassan S, Montgomery A, Lievesley M, Norton J, Owen-Boukra EC, Rapley T, Roberts N, Sajid M, Sowden S, Steven A, Vance G, Park S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: BMJ Open
Year: 2025
Volume: 15
Issue: 12
Online publication date: 23/12/2025
Acceptance date: 04/12/2025
Date deposited: 07/01/2026
ISSN (print): 2044-6055
ISSN (electronic): 2044-6055
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110991
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110991
PubMed id: 41436273
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
