Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Katherine Livingstone, Dr Carlos Celis Morales, Eileen Gibney, Professor Lorraine Brennan, Professor John Mathers
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© The Authors 2019.Original text and corrections: ORIGINAL TEXT (page 3296, Abstract) Subjects: Adults aged 18-79 years (n 1480). CORRECTION Subjects: Adults aged 18-79 years at baseline (n 1480). ORIGINAL TEXT (page 3298, Results) Of the 5562 individuals who registered on the Food4Me website, 1607 were randomised into the study and a total of 1480 provided baseline data on dietary intakes(17). CORRECTION Of the 5562 individuals who registered on the Food4Me website, 1607 were randomised into the study. A total of 1480 participants provided baseline data on dietary intakes (15). Following exclusion of missing data for covariates the baseline sample was 1285. A total of 1147 participants provided complete follow up data. ORIGINAL TEXT (page 3300, Results) There were no significant differences in changes in HEI between clusters when PN was stratified by Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 (data not shown). CORRECTION The results for when PN was stratified by L1, L2 or L3 are presented in Supplementary Table 5. For participants in L2, there were bigger improvements in HEI for participants in C4 compared with C1 (P <0.001) and in C3 and C2 compared with C1 (<0.05). For participants in L3, there were bigger improvements in HEI for participants in C4 compared with C1 and C2 (P<0.05) (Supplementary Table 5). There were no significant differences for participants in L1. ORIGINAL TEXT (page 3300, Results) Exclusion of participants with reported intakes more than 3 SD above or below the mean dietary intakes of whole grains, oily fish, red meat and fruit and vegetables revealed similar clusters (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table 5).CORRECTION Exclusion of participants with reported intakes more than 3 SD above or below the mean dietary intakes of wholegrain, oily fish, red meat and fruit and vegetables revealed similar clusters (Supplementary Table 6). ORIGINAL TEXT (page 3302, Discussion) We observed that individuals in the cluster where the fewest recommendations were met (C4) reported the biggest improvement in HEI following PN intervention but there were no differences between clusters in response to conventional, non-personalised dietary advice. CORRECTION We observed that individuals in the cluster where the fewest recommendations were met (C4) reported the biggest improvement in HEI following PN intervention. ORIGINAL TEXT (page 3302, Discussion) Fig. 1 Changes from baseline to month 6 in Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI) score by cluster of adherence to dietary recommendations at baseline among adults aged 18-79 years (n 1480), Food4Me study. CORRECTION Figure 1 Changes from baseline to month 6 in Healthy Eating Index by clusters of adherence to recommendations at baseline among adults aged 18-79 years (n 1,147), Food4Me study. ORIGINAL TEXT (page 3300, Results) Table needed CORRECTION Table 1 Food and nutrient and intakes by participants by clusters of adherence to recommendations at baseline among adults aged 18-79 years (n 1285), Food4Me study (Table Presented).
Author(s): Livingstone KM, Celis-Morales C, Lara J, Woolhead C, O'Donovan CB, Forster H, Marsaux CFM, Macready AL, Fallaize R, Navas-Carretero S, San-Cristobal R, Kolossa S, Tsirigoti L, Lambrinou CP, Moschonis G, Surwillo A, Drevon CA, Manios Y, Traczyk I, Gibney ER, Brennan L, Walsh MC, Lovegrove JA, Martinez JA, Saris WHM, Daniel H, Gibney M, Mathers JC
Publication type: Note
Publication status: Published
Journal: Public Health Nutrition
Year: 2019
Volume: 22
Issue: 11
Pages: 2141-2146
Print publication date: 01/08/2019
Online publication date: 12/06/2019
Acceptance date: 02/04/2018
ISSN (print): 1368-9800
ISSN (electronic): 1475-2727
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019001502
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019001502